The Team
was initiated in 2000, although it took a while to capture the attention
of the community, with initially weak participation in the early
public education forums. Some members speculated that the community
did not realize the severity of the pollution in the watershed.
In order to garner more public attention, they ran a series of full-page
newspaper ads featuring informational articles about the problems
of the watershed and the Team's purpose. In response, significantly
more citizens attended the final forum in December of 2001.
Since
the end of the public forums, the Team has ranked its priorities
and has developed several drafts of their Pollution Control Strategy
(PCS). These are based on three core values; to be fair and equitable,
to consider both individual rights and responsibilities and the
public good, and to clearly articulate intent and purpose. Recent
meetings have focused on revising the drafts.
Although
conservation buffers and set-backs already exist for properties
adjacent to waterways, the Team is discussing the value of recommending
additional requirements to further protect and buffer the Nanticoke
and its tributaries. These zones serve as sinks for excess nutrients
and help protect the vital wetlands and tributaries of the Nanticoke
Watershed. The team is also compiling data on septic systems and
land use plans to reduce nutrient runoff. They are interested in
alternative septic systems and requiring new developments to have
open spaces for groundwater recharge and wastewater treatment facilities.
The three
current wastewater facilities in the watershed serve Seaford, Laurel
and Bridgeville. All are in compliance with the TMDL requirements.
However, if Laurel or Bridgeville wish to expand their operations
(because of increased growth), they will need to make changes in
their operations. Seaford has already upgraded to nutrient removal
technology and will be able to handle increased loads. The Team
is hoping to complete their PCS Draft and submit it to DNREC in
the next few months.
As a
lifelong resident of the area, Jack Connor has a treasure trove
of memories about the Nanticoke River. He can remember fishing on
the river as a child, and taking his own children fishing there
as well. He can remember a time when the river wasn’t as clean
as it is today; when raw sewage drained directly into it. Today
he still lives and kayaks on the river and is involved with his
wife in several different river conservation organizations, such
as the Nanticoke Watershed Alliance. As a retired surveyor, Jack
has a different perspective of the area. He’s always been
conscious of land use and its impacts to the river. He would argue
that although the Nanticoke has been improved, there is still progress
to be made. “I’d like to see it cleaned up,” he
says. He admires the Tributary Action Team’s ability to discuss
and contribute ideas to the Pollution Control Strategy. Jack admits
that from time to time, “…we agree to disagree on some
issues”, but everyone has a voice to be heard. Jack especially
acknowledges the agricultural industry, giving them a lot of credit
for constructing the Purdue Pelletization Plant and changing farming
practices to reduce nutrient runoff. As a resident turned activist,
Jack has seen many changes, both positive and negative in the Nanticoke
River, but he hopes the future will bring more positive changes,
especially in residents' behavior and lifestyles.