|

Sussex
County Quality of Life Study
Discusses Growth Trends
During
the last few decades, the coastal area of Delaware's Sussex County,
like coastal areas around the country, experienced dramatic increases
in residential and commercial development. A lot of this development
took place within the Inland Bays watershed. In 2002, the University
of Delaware Sea Grant
Marine Advisory Service examined growth trends in population
and housing units in Sussex County and surveyed residents
about various growth and development issues. The Sussex County
Quality of Life Study collected US
Census data about
growth trends in the county over the last several decades,
but the primary focus of the study concentrated on the data for the
decade beginning in 1990.
The
study used the census tracts within the county to more closely
analyze growth trends. Although the these tract borders
do not align exactly with the boundaries of the Inland Bays watershed,
the trends around the bays are quite evident.
Between 1990
and 2000, the population of Sussex County grew 38.3%, with even
greater growth in the coastal areas. During the period,
housing units increased 25%. There are seven census tracts
surrounding the Inland Bays, four of which were the highest-growing
tracts in the county. Tract 512, which extends along the
oceanfront from the Indian River Inlet south to the Maryland
state line, encompassing Bethany Beach, South Bethany, Fenwick
Island and the unincorporated areas in between, experienced the
county’s
most dramatic population increase of 190.6% during the 1990s.
Tract 510, extending from the Midway area between Rehoboth
and Lewes and along the western shore of Rehoboth Bay to the northern
shore of Herring Creek, grew by 82.6%. Tract 507, including
the southern shore of Herring Creek, the Long Neck and Oak Orchard
areas and the northern shore of Indian River to Millsboro, grew
by 76.6%. Tract 513, which includes the southern shore
of Indian River Bay, the towns of Ocean View, Millville, Clarksville
and the entire Little Assawoman Bay watershed, saw a population
increase of 73.4% during the decade.

Sussex County Census Tracts
The
number of housing units countywide increased 25.3% from 1990
to 2000. Tracts around the Inland Bays watershed that
had the highest increases in housing units were 510 (37.5%),
513 (34.4%) and 512 (26.0%). Outside of the watershed,
housing-unit increases greater than the countywide average
occurred in tract 508 (46.6%), which includes Milton, 517 (36.6%)
in the south-central part of the county and 503 (36.2%), including
the Greenwood and Bridgeville areas and 519 (30.1%) in the southwest
corner of the county.
More extensive research of census data would show the specific
areas within the census tracts where the most significant population
and housing growth has occurred.
The
study included a mail survey
of 1,600 county residents to determine attitudes, perceptions
and opinions about various quality of life factors and the growth
and development issues facing the county. The county was
divided into four groups of census tracts for this survey. These
groups divided the county into four north-south “tiers” beginning
at the ocean and Delaware Bay shore and extending to the western
boundary of the county. These groups of tracts were designated
Primary Coastal, Secondary Coastal, Mid-County and Western tracts.
Mail surveys were sent to a random sample of residents in each
of the four tract groups in proportion to the population, with
oversamples in the two eastern tract groups.

Primary
Coastal Tracts
|

Secondary
Coastal Tracts
|

Mid-county
Tracts |

Western
Tracts |
The
survey generated at 46% return rate, and the results were initially
analyzed for the entire county. The responses were then
divided between the two eastern tract groups, called “coastal,” and
the two western tract groups, called “inland.” Significant
differences were observed between the two groups of residents
in demographics, attitudes, perceptions and relative importance
of various quality of life factors.
Although
not a part of the Sussex County Quality of Life Study, the amount
of impervious surfaces in a given area is a significant characteristic
of land use and is an indicator for water quality trends. Impervious
surfaces include roads, residential and commercial structures,
sidewalks, parking lots, driveways and other hard surfaces that
prevent the natural draining of water into the ground. These
structures and surfaces channel rainwater in particular directions,
through gutters and storm drains, thus increasing runoff velocity
and pollutant concentrations in the runoff. This is of
particular concern in the effort to improve the Inland Bays water
quality.
Impervious
surface is usually expressed as a percentage of a known land
area, and 10% is often used as a threshold, above which degradation
of water quality in a given area is likely. According to
data from early 2004, the Lewes-Rehoboth Canal sub-watershed
is above the threshold with 15.6% impervious surface, and the
other seven sub-watersheds within the greater Inland Bays watershed
are within two percent of reaching the threshold. The
other sub-watersheds and their impervious surface percentages
are Assawoman (8.7%), Buntings Branch (9.7%), Indian River Bay
(9.0%), Indian River (8.6%), Iron Branch (8.4%), Little Assawoman
(9.6%) and Rehoboth Bay (8.8%). These impervious surface
percentages indicate problematic levels of pollutants may be
reaching the inland bays and their tributaries from developed
areas.
|