|

PERSPECTIVE: TMDLs
and the Sussex
County Development Community
By Brooks Clayville, Consultant
We
all are aware that total maximum daily
load (TMDL) implementation
will likely have dramatic impacts on land use. When land
use on a parcel changes from a category that has a low regulatory
burden, such as agriculture or forestry, to a more highly regulated
use, such as commercial or residential development, water quality
improvement practices can be required by the approving authority
to help meet TMDL goals. Developers will soon have to toe
the TMDL line in order to gain site plan approval for their projects.
A casual
observer to the development process may think that TMDLs could
serve as a brake to development or even to stop it altogether. As a
consultant and citizen planner who regularly works with developers, I do
not think that will be the case. The current state of TMDL enforcement
for the Inland Bays — where
the Pollution Control Strategy (PCS) has not yet been approved, and the regulations
to support the PCS implementation have not been implemented — is likely causing
more unrest for developers than will occur once all PCS processes and regulations
are in place. Developers are people too — change and ambiguity
can lead to stress. Once they know what is required of their projects
to meet TMDL goals, they will step up and implement the needed design standards
to reach TMDL compliance, just as they comply with site plan and zoning codes,
wetland and shoreline issues, landscaping and traffic planning, and building
construction standards.
I expect
the most painful changes involving TMDL implementation will be
faced by the farming and forestry folks, along with existing
developments and homeowners that may not have all nutrient reducing
practices in place. Retrofitting existing homes and businesses
to meet TMDLs can be expensive at best, and impossible
at worst. Farmers have been required to develop and implement nutrient
management plans, but TMDLs could call for mandatory buffering and
other farmland set-asides that will be costly. Developers
are accustomed to dealing with the multiple layers of costs and
regulations that TMDLs can bring, but the average
homeowner and farmer may not have the resources to implement nutrient
reduction.
Stay
tuned — this will all get more interesting in the next few months
as the PCS goes to the public hearing stage.
Editor’s
Note: This
article is an editorial and does not reflect the DNREC’s
views. We appreciate the contribution of these articles by
members of the watershed communities and Tributary Action Teams.
|